Radio Free never takes money from corporate interests, which ensures our publications are in the interest of people, not profits. Radio Free provides free and open-source tools and resources for anyone to use to help better inform their communities. Learn more and get involved at radiofree.org

The representative on freedom of the media for the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) has expressed “serious concerns” about the ongoing prosecution of Russian journalist Svetlana Prokopyeva.

OSCE representative Harlem Desir on March 17 reiterated his call for Russian authorities to drop the terrorism charges brought against Prokopyeva, saying she “had no involvement in any terrorist activity or an intention to condone terrorism.”

Desir’s plea came a day after Prokopyeva, a freelance contributor for RFE/RL’s Russian Service, said she had been handed an indictment document at the prosecutor’s office in Pskov.

Prokopyeva has denies the charge. She describes the criminal case against her as an attempt to “murder the freedom of speech” in Russia.

If convicted, she faces up to seven years in prison.

The charges against Prokopyeva stem from a November 2018 commentary for the Pskov affiliate of Ekho Moskvy in which she discussed a bombing that occurred the previous week outside the Federal Security Service (FSB) offices in the far northern city of Arkhangelsk.

Russian media reported that the suspected bomber, a teenager who died in the explosion, had posted statements on social media accusing the FSB of falsifying criminal cases.

In her commentary, Prokopyeva linked the teenager’s statements to the political climate in Russia under President Vladimir Putin. She suggested that political activism in the country was severely restricted, leading people to despair.

In his March 17 statement, Desir said that “her comments, however critical, had nothing to do with the promotion or support of terrorism.”

RFE/RL President Jamie Fly has said the charges were brought against Prokopyeva “in a cynical effort to silence an independent journalist.”

The case has drawn criticism from media rights groups like Reporters Without Borders, the Committee to Protect Journalists, and the European Federation of Journalists.