Radio Free never takes money from corporate interests, which ensures our publications are in the interest of people, not profits. Radio Free provides free and open-source tools and resources for anyone to use to help better inform their communities. Learn more and get involved at radiofree.org

In an early indication of which ideological faction of the Democratic Party will control the policy agenda in the upcoming Congress, a House body tasked with deciding committee assignments overwhelmingly voted Thursday to deny progressive Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez a spot on the powerful Energy and Commerce panel, instead handing the seat to centrist Rep. Kathleen Rice.

The landslide 46-13 vote in favor of Rice by the House Steering and Policy Committee—which is chaired by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.)—did not surprise progressives, given Ocasio-Cortez’s willingness to publicly break from the party establishment on key policy matters and criticize Pelosi’s leadership, as she did in an interview with The Intercept released this week.

But Ocasio-Cortez, a supporter of the Green New Deal and Medicare for All, did receive significant support from the New York congressional delegation in her push for the coveted slot on Energy and Commerce, which has jurisdiction over a broad array of policy areas including climate and public health. House Judiciary Chair Jerry Nadler (D-N.Y.), dean of the New York delegation, signed a letter in support of Ocasio-Cortez, as did more than a dozen other members.

“The moderate and conservative Dems are winning these early battles, which will set the legislative agenda for the next two years.”
—Lee Fang, The Intercept

Rice—a New York Democrat who, unlike Ocasio-Cortez, voted against Pelosi for speaker last year—received some support from the state delegation as well.

Reporting on Thursday’s secret-ballot vote indicates that Ocasio-Cortez’s support for Medicare for All and the Green New Deal, both of which would come under the purview of the Energy and Commerce Committee, was a factor in the vote to hand the seat to Rice, who does not support either progressive policy.

“Some senior Democrats, including on the Energy and Commerce panel, had privately voiced concerns about Ocasio-Cortez landing the seat,” Politico reported. “Some feared that the firebrand Democrat, who backs progressive priorities like the ‘Green New Deal’ and ‘Medicare for All,’ could cause issues as Congress attempts to draft bipartisan health and climate policies next year.”

Ocasio-Cortez was not the only progressive rejected by the Steering and Policy Committee in favor of a moderate, business-friendly Democrat. In addition to Rice, the committee also gave Energy and Commerce spots to Reps. Lori Trahan (D-Mass.), Angie Craig (D-Minn.), Kim Schrier (D-Wash.), and Lizzie Fletcher (D-Texas).

“It is very clear the party leadership is working to shut out progressives and has no intention of working with the left to ‘build back better,'” argued journalist Walker Bragman, a contributor to The Daily Poster.

As The Intercept‘s Lee Fang pointed out on Twitter, all five of the Democrats chosen for Energy and Commerce seats “are pro-business New Dem caucus members, all beating progressives vying for seats.”

“The moderate and conservative Dems are winning these early battles,” noted Fang, “which will set the legislative agenda for the next two years.”

Citations

[1]https://twitter.com/lhfang/status/1339768555466760198[2]https://www.politico.com/news/2020/12/17/kathleen-rice-aoc-house-committee-448001[3] Ocasio-Cortez Warns Biden That War and Wall Street Appointees Are a 'Huge Reason We Got Trump' | Common Dreams ➤ https://www.commondreams.org/news/2020/12/16/ocasio-cortez-warns-biden-war-and-wall-street-appointees-are-huge-reason-we-got[4]https://www.politico.com/news/2020/12/08/ocasio-cortez-kathleen-rice-house-energy-commerce-443743[5]https://www.rollcall.com/2019/01/03/here-are-the-15-democrats-who-didnt-vote-for-pelosi-as-speaker/[6]https://www.politico.com/news/2020/12/08/ocasio-cortez-kathleen-rice-house-energy-commerce-443743[7]https://www.speaker.gov/newsroom/121720[8]https://twitter.com/WalkerBragman/status/1339778057213763584[9]https://twitter.com/lhfang/status/1339768555466760198